Fifty Shades Darker

Fifty Shades Darker
Fifty Shades Darker.2017.hd.1080p
Download NowWatch Now
Every fairy tale has a dark side.
Fifty Shades Darker Poster
5.9/10 by 1575 users
Watch Trailer

When a wounded Christian Grey tries to entice a cautious Ana Steele back into his life, she demands a new arrangement before she will give him another chance. As the two begin to build trust and find stability, shadowy figures from Christian’s past start to circle the couple, determined to destroy their hopes for a future together.

Title:Fifty Shades Darker
Release Date:February 8, 2017
Genres:Drama, Romance
Production Co.:Universal Pictures, Perfect World Pictures (Beijing)
Production Countries:United States of America
Director:Suze Dunbar, Sandra Montgomery, James Foley
Casts:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Plot Keywords:sex, based on novel, boat, nudity, present, kiss, sequel, bdsm, adaptation, erotic movie, oral sex
Alternative Titles:
  • Vijftig tinten donkerder - [NL]
  • 50 Shades Darker - [US]
  • Pesëdhjetë Hije më të Errëta - [AL]
  • Cincuenta sombras más oscuras - [AR]
  • Cincuenta sombras más oscuras - [CL]
  • Khamishim gvanim shel offel - [IL]
  • Cincuenta sombras más oscuras - [PE]
  • Pedeset nijanski - mračnije - [RS]
  • Cincuenta sombras más oscuras - [UY]
  • 格雷的五十道色戒2 - [HK]
  • Fifty Shades of Grey 2 - Fifty Shades Darker - [CA]

Fifty Shades Darker Reviews

  • We made so much money on a crappy film that we made a part 2
    by Bruce Berman on 10 February 2017

    206 out of 327 people found the following review useful:

    This movie has horrible acting and it's basically nothing but a cheesy cringey chic flick that makes all the single girls that fantasies about having a relationship that is abusive but also stand up for women's rights panties wet. And for the dudes that go watch this..there are so many porn sites that a free and you don't have to sit through hours of bad dialogue for a 15 min soft porn scene. The only reason they keep making these films is because idiots keep buying tickets to go watch this movie. Horrible ratings and people still stand by and defend it. Stop giving a movie high ratings because it increases your hormone levels you horny animals lol

  • Twilight meets American Psycho, minus the good parts.
    by rwalsh-86143 on 20 February 2017

    98 out of 120 people found the following review useful:

    I sat through the last half of 50 shades darker today because my sister was using my Macbook to watch it... Let me sum it up for you:

    Him: "I'm not good with people because I'm mysterious."

    Her: "I like mysterious, but I'm scared cause I'm fragile."

    Him: "Don't be afraid, I'm the one who is afraid... of hurting you."

    *Have Some Sex*

    Her: "You're so thoughtful, maybe I misjudged you. Now I want to be hurt... just not emotionally."

    Him: "I always hurt people, but I would never hurt you... unless you wanted me to."

    Her: "Ouch, you hurt me. Now my feelings are hurt and I'm sad and my whole life hurts."

    Him: "I'm sorry if I hurt you. I'll try harder, but I don't think I'll ever change.'

    Her: "I'm gonna pretend like I didn't hear that, but please don't hurt me again. I trust you to change for me- projects are fun."

    Him: "Put these things in your ass."

    Her: "No." Him: "Okay, I'm not good with people because I'm mysterious."

    *Have Some Sex Again*

    Aaaand Credits

  • The worst film I've ever seen
    by Sam Park on 13 February 2017

    124 out of 172 people found the following review useful:

    While not having particularly high expectations, it must be said, I did go into this film with an open mind. However only a few minutes in and I already felt the urge to leave and fill my brain with something less awful and mind rotting.

    It's not just the non-existent plot and hammy acting that let this film down, although they were major factors, the chemistry between the two leads was like watching two planks of wood getting together. None of what I saw made me believe he was an irresistible sex god with a dark side. And with Ana, let's just say biting ones lip every time something is suggested gets a bit old.

    Furthermore, without wanting to spoil, is her IQ supposed to be about 50? I have to ask because she pretty much agrees to everything he says, and not in a dom/sub kind of way, more just because she doesn't seem to have the mental ability to argue. You have to wonder how she's employed in the first place.

    I've seen some absolutely dire films but I can honestly say this is the worst film I've ever seen.

  • The first contender on worst movie in 2017
    by Lucas Dant on 9 February 2017

    107 out of 149 people found the following review useful:

    This movie is awful, yes, there's the best way to describe this movie.

    Acting, terrible, the story does not make sense. The girl that's in the trailer has no impact in the movie. It's once again just about sex and a bad... really bad written movie.

    The soundtrack can be said that's decent. Some of the camera work as well is good. But that resumes all the movie. It's once again a bait for teenagers girls that want to go watch soft porn in the cinemas once again.

    Sorry to be really straight to the point here, but if you really liked this movie maybe you have some issues.. or it's me?

  • What a letdown...but funny in the worst way?
    by Femme_X on 10 February 2017

    112 out of 163 people found the following review useful:

    I saw it and yeah...I had fun, laughing I guess? For anyone who tells me that its a beautiful, love story...f*ck off. It was the cheesiest, corniest, most awkward-comedic film. But hey, it worked for a great comedy where the jokes on the film. Seriously, the scenes were so bad you couldn't help but laugh. I think FSoG was better in the aspect to take it a bit more "serious" than FSD. This film completely did not give a f*ck, I was disappointed that the plots and other characters (Mrs. Robinson, Jack Hyde, Leila) were weak! It had potential to explore more of these arcs, but it didn't. It was dull and so rushed! Everything was rushed. Even the sex! I'm not expecting full-blown porn but cut the soundtrack songs out, more positions (not just mostly missionary all the time), and please bring in some foreplay. How can a movie about risqué intimacy not show good foreplay? Why does Christian always have an un-emotional face while having sex? No climax either? In the books, wasn't he always grinning (or proudly smiling) for his accomplishment in giving Ana orgasms? For getting off too? None of cuts straight to the next scene. Man...and why was it so Soap-Opera-ish?

    I'm not going to lie, I read the trilogy once and I was like, "whatever, this is the junk food to my brain". It wasn't good, but whatever... it served some purpose. Did I think that it was the greatest love story? Nope. Did I think it was a great romantic story? Nope. I was honestly intrigued by the fetish that surrounds BDSM. But it turned out, that even if the sex was hot, it wasn't even portrayed properly. BDSM is a whole other level.

    I was walking out and a lot of the viewers said that it did poorly in capturing the book. Like sure, the sex was there, but that connectivity...intimacy... was not. It was like : fight, bang (sex). Argument, bang. Present, bang again. It was repetitive in the sense of just make-up sex all the time. Ana is annoying. She doesn't know what she wants in the film or in life. Its like she can't take Christian's dark ways and not kidding, a few seconds later she's okay with it, without any solidifying reason (unless its going down on her or sex) . I feel like FSoG (2015) attempted some direction towards a woman's viewpoint. Like Ana being "dominant" in the sense of negotiation and choices. In this film, I'm sorry...she comes off like a gold-digger. She comes off like the only reason she's with him is because he's rich. Its like "I can't be with you, like this...(he gives her a gift), oh, I love you!) WTF? She tries so hard to be her own woman, but really ends up being Christian's (and not in the cute way like "Oh, I'm his girl *googly-eyes*) I feel that FSoG (2015) did a better job in where Ana had control and it made sense. Here it's wishy-washy.

    Its just a mess, not sexy, everything is rushed that you don't understand the reasoning behind motives. They cut off and rushed great moments and characters that could have given the film more sense, romance and great eroticism. Yes its funny because it tries so hard to take itself serious. But that's about it.

  • They managed to make a worse film than the first.... Bravo!!!!
    by adonis98-743-186503 on 14 February 2017

    52 out of 72 people found the following review useful:

    While Christian wrestles with his inner demons, Anastasia must confront the anger and envy of the women who came before her. There was at least a 5% inside my brain that hoped to find something good in this whole mess or at least for this movie to be a bit decent, unfortunately this is one of the worst films of 2017 at least so far with some of the most boring sex scenes i have ever seen, awful dialogue and really weird sense of humor and the 2 main stars had an on/off kind of chemistry plus that helicopter sequence looked a bit decent in the trailer so i won't lie on that but in the actual movie it was painful to sit threw. This movie uses lines such as "Kinky F*ckery" and thinks that it's funny or smart but it's not it's funny in a very different kind of way. Overall at the end of the day this 'Fifty Shades of Grey' sequel was even worse than the original with horrible acting, plot and characters that are abusive and creepy as hell and i'm still wondering how Kim Basinger went from Batman and L.A Confidential to 'Fifty Shades Darker' but hey look at the good side of things this Franchise is so bad that we can make fun of it every day but if you did liked the first film you will probably like this one as well but for everyone else? STAY AWAY!!! (0/10)

  • Watch Psychopath and Plain Jane Date the movie
    by sara2520 on 15 February 2017

    60 out of 88 people found the following review useful:

    If you are a basic looking chick looking a movie about a rich, hot dude dating a plain chick, then this the movie for you.It doesn't matter whether he is a psychopath, controlling, possessive, dating you because you remind him of his dead mother, and gets off on abusing you. As long as he is rich and good looking, then it's worth it to you and you will enjoy this movie. This movie is designed for you. There is nothing special or interesting about these characters or the one dimensional background cast. You're watching them date for an hour and a half with an vanilla sex scene for every ten to fifteen minutes of talking. There is no conflict or problems in this movie. All the scenes of potential conflicts of the trailer are resolved within minutes after they happen. Anastasia has no backbone in this movie. She gripes and complains about not doing what he wants, then go ahead and do whatever he wants anyway.So if you want to see a movie about Anastasia and Christian date for two hours and have sex, then this is the movie for you.Pros: I liked the first movie because it was so bad it was funny and the soundtrack was good. This movie is literally the two of them getting back together and dating and the soundtrack was okay.

  • Fifty Shades Darker – Anastasia Bites her Lip Again
    by brankovranjkovic on 12 February 2017

    76 out of 122 people found the following review useful:

    Stars Minnesota Johnson as the submissive girlfriend and Jamie Doorknob, as the dominant, controlling boyfriend. This is soft-core porn for girls and I noticed that the screening I attended was almost entirely a female audience. Though be aware that the erotic scenes are not the kind of sex girls want to see or probably enjoy.

    I didn't care about the lead actors, who had very little chemistry in between the sex scenes and even those were pretty dull, the elevator scene is a good example of what I mean.

    The plot is poor, the drama is rubbish, the acting is wooden, and the dialogue is laughable rubbish. The film is unintentionally funny when supposed to be serious, and boring when supposed to be sexy. Although sexier than the original film (my wife tells me) not as graphically sexy as the book. I sat through the pain of this and at the end felt glad I wasn't Christian Grey, though being a billionaire is always very appealing.

    So in summary, this is a rubbish sequel to the original garbage but will do very well because it's been released over the limited window coinciding with the Valentine's period.

  • Lost my time and self respect as a girl by watching it
    by Annie C. on 14 February 2017

    96 out of 162 people found the following review useful:

    Frankly, do you call this a movie or soft porn that promotes male domination and humiliates women? Wasted my money and time by watching this movie just because some of my friends wanted to watch it badly. This movie just pollutes the minds of our younger generation. Everything from dialogues, sex scenes and acting is poor. The music was a bit good for which I gave one star. Honestly we women are not like this. We also like to have good, clean and natural relationships in our life. We don't always want to get wet and indulge in a submissive relationship. Fifty shades of grey started it and now this title made it worst further. Please come up with some good story-line. Thumbs down. It only frustrated me and nothing else.

  • Wow what a shame
    by Emma on 18 February 2017

    47 out of 65 people found the following review useful:

    Wow what a disappointment !! I personally loved the books ,i saw the back story behind all the sex of a broken man finding and learning to love really beautiful. The movie , well there are so many things wrong with it starting with the cinematography ,it's just all too perfect Hollywood and not enough rawness and realness to it and i hate it .Next is the cast i mean i love Jamie Dornan and Dakota is OK but they were so not right for this movie!No chemistry or heat between them and very wooden analytical acting.Jamie Dornan in The Fall was awesome by the way i am not a hater.Other cast also was wrong from Elana to Mia and so on.The movie also seems very rushed ,I know it is an adaptation of the book but not done smoothly in my opinion , It makes me really sad as these movies could have been great if only they had gotten it right ,Take a page out of "Nick Cassavetes" book because he directed The Notebook perfectly.

Similar Movies

  • Deadly Force Poster
    3.5/10 by 2 users
    Original Title:Deadly Force
    Release Date:July 8, 1983
  • Hitch Hike Poster
    6.9/10 by 13 users
    Original Title:Autostop rosso sangue
    Release Date:April 30, 1977
  • The Hot Nights of Linda Poster
    2.6/10 by 26 users
    Original Title:Les nuits brûlantes de Linda
    Release Date:July 16, 1975
  • The Key Poster
    4.8/10 by 36 users
    Original Title:La chiave
    Release Date:October 18, 1983
  • Eugenie Poster
    3.7/10 by 14 users
    Original Title:Eugenie
    Release Date:February 20, 1970
  • Private Lessons Poster
    6/10 by 15 users
    Original Title:Private Lessons
    Release Date:August 21, 1981